- SCHOOL MAY FACE STRONG PARENTAL OPPOSITION IF BIOMETRICS IS IMPOSED WITHOUT CONSENT
How not to introduce biometrics:
A row has blown up after it was revealed children as young as six have had their fingerprints taken - to borrow books from their school libraries. The move has sparked outrage among parents. One parent, whose daughter had her prints taken when she was just six-years-old, said: "I'm just not happy at all. These are children, not terrorists or criminals." 15-03-07 Sheffield Today - read more
At one school in Bradford, every child was fingerprinted the day after they received a letter from a parent, who is a computer expert, expressing serious concerns. Parents vowed to fight on. 28-03-07 Parent's blog - read more
Dudley Council's ever-popular "Tips For Fingerprinting Children" 14-09-06 read more
- THERE ARE SERIOUS HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUES IF BIOMETRIC REGISTRATION FAILS
"[Biometric registration] needs a backup strategy, [for example] that the administration staff will at some point print the roll call and then confirm by visiting each non fully-attended class room that the printout is in fact an accurate record... How long will the overall registration process now take? Currently each teacher takes his/her own register, this is happening in parallel. The proposed backstop is a largely a sequential process. This obviously means it will take longer to provide full clarity of who is present in school, perhaps a big deal in the case of emergency evacuation.
Issues that will effect this time are:
- Admin staff busy dealing with another task
- Printer jams, or out of toner/paper
- Computer crashes
- Power loss in the building
- Network failure
- Scanner fails in classroom
These risks are in stark contrast to the traditional method, where the risk is limited to a pen not working.
So an evacuation at the start of the day might not provide clarity of who is in the building. Whilst in the existing system it may be possible for one teacher not to provide clarity it is hard to see a scenario where all teachers do not have complete clarity... [Biometric registration] is heavily centralised and thus opens the possibility for single point of failure, something that should be avoided in all critical systems." Andrew Clymer, senior identity management security expert (more than 8 years with Cisco Systems, Visa, Fidelity, Merrill Lynch, etc) (read more from Andrew Clymer)
"The school districts didn't think the problem through. Either they were seduced by the technology, or by the companies that built the system... The security gained is not worth the money and privacy spent. If the goal is to make children safer, the money would be better spent elsewhere." Bruce Schneier, respected US writer and lecturer on issues surrounding security and privacy, who has testified before Congress and authored eight books and dozens of articles and academic papers. (read more from Bruce Schneier)
- THE SCHOOL MAY INCUR CIVIL AND LEGAL LIABILITY IF CHILDREN'S DATA IS STOLEN
"Consider replacing this product with other based on more mature technology and exposing children and schools to less long term danger and liability." Kim Cameron, architect of identity and access in the connected systems division at Microsoft, 31 March 2007 (read more from Kim Cameron - 2nd quote)
"It is highly likely that in less than ten years Chip and PIN may be replaced by Chip and thumbprint. We will see the increasing use of biometrics to protect the things we most need to protect. Like all forms of password protection we are encouraged to keep this information private, in fact we are told to destroy any paper copies. Obviously banks keep this information in some form in order to validate our identity at the point of transaction, this information as you can imagine needs to be kept extremely securely... Imagine that hackers did not have to crack a bank's computer; they could hack small businesses, local libraries or even a school's computer... Currently there is little to no reason to hack a school's computer, but in the future the trade of biometric information may be as common as spam or mailing lists today." Andrew Clymer, senior identity management security expert (more than 8 years with Cisco Systems, Visa, Fidelity, Merrill Lynch, etc) (read more from Andrew Clymer)
- SIGNIFICANT COST IMPLICATIONS OF WIPING DATA PROFESSIONALLY AS RECOMMENDED BY ICO
Organisations and individuals within organisations have a duty of care obligation to ensure that the confidential data they hold is not released in an unauthorised or accidental way, particularly that relating to employees or pupils. This includes storage media such as hard disk drives. Non-compliance can lead to heavy fines, compensation for individuals whom have suffered unauthorised disclosure of confidential data (section 13 DPA 99), and damaging media exposure.
On 9th February 2007 an advisory statement was issued by the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) telling schools to erase children's biometric data from school computers by using professional data cleansing companies: "under the Data Protection Act schools must also dispose of the data using professional data cleansing companies once the child has left or if it no longer of use."
It is the school's responsibility to destroy any personal data that may be stored on the machines. Just hitting the delete button is simply not enough to wipe the data. To ensure maximum data security the school will need to use a professional data wiping solution that makes recovery of the data very difficult. A check should also be carried out to ensure the data has been properly overwritten, and schools should obtain certificates of disposal for their records, as proof of compliance.
It is important to bear in mind that recent advances in computer forensics allow data to be recovered from hard discs under most circumstances. Hence totally secure destruction can only be achieved by shredding and or incineration of the hard disk or other media on which the data is stored. This will have a significant cost implication for schools.
Even if the data is simply wiped using a professional data cleansing company, the cost can be significant - a typical cost of US$5 per record could be incurred.
- ALL MAJOR OPPOSITION PARTIES ARE OPPOSED TO SCHOOL BIOMETRICS AND MAY LEGISLATE
Early Day Motion 686 concerning biometric data collection in schools (19.01.2007) has attracted considerable cross-party support. (read more about this)
"I am astonished to learn that fingerprinting of children is done at schools and for such a relatively minor matter of borrowing books from the school library. A major concern must be who would have access to this data and what happens to it after children leave the school. It is particularly wrong that this is being done without parents' consent" The Rt Hon David Davis MP, Conservative Shadow Home Secretary, 27th July 2006
"I believe that the collection of biometric data from young pupils without parental consent is illegal and must cease." Sarah Teather MP, Liberal Democrat Shadow Education Secretary, 20th January 2007
"There really are some civil liberty issues... [Schools] should not be doing this. They should find another method of identification for borrowing library books." Nick Gibb MP, Conservative Shadow Minister For Schools, 13th October 2006
"It's outrageous that Ministers have allowed schools to continue this potentially illegal behaviour for so long without stepping in." Greg Mulholland MP, Liberal Democrat Education Spokesperson
"Are you not concerned about the impression children are going to get of what it is to live in a free country and what it is to be British if, in order to get the right school meals, they have fingerprints taken? It seems to me completely astonishing." Baroness Carnegy, Conservative, 19th March 2007, speaking in the House of Lords (read more from Baroness Carnegy)
"The practice of fingerprinting in schools has been banned in China as being too intrusive and an infringement of children's rights? Here, it is widespread. We have even had a head teacher tricking three year-olds into giving their fingerprints by playing a spy game. Will the Government ban schools from carrying out this practice, unless parents specifically opt into the system following full and independent information about the so-called benefits of the system and the dangers of identity fraud?" Baroness Walmsley, Liberal Democrat, 19th March 2007, speaking in the House of Lords (read more from Baroness Walmsley)