![]() |
LeaveThemKidsAlone.com ©
LTKA © against schools fingerprinting our children |
| Read what the BBC said about this issue Please tell a friend |
>> Vital questions you need to ask your children's school about fingerprinting <<
|
|
WARNING: Some computer security experts feel that in the future it will be possible for the information stored on school biometric systems to be used to steal your child's identity |
"If the people of Eastern Europe had been subject to the same level of surveillance and control that is now being proposed in the UK, the Berlin Wall would still be standing today. With everyone's fingerprints and DNA on a government database, all protesters would have faced immediate arrest and imprisonment. Here, it's already against the law to protest within a mile of Parliament. That's not the kind of world I want for my children." Pippa King, privacy campaigner.
Nothing to hide, nothing to fear? So how would you feel if your neighbours opened all your letters and read them? Yet the state scans everyone's emails on a daily basis, under powers granted by the Regulation Of Investigatory Powers Act (2000). Since 2003, the Act has been extended so that tens of thousands of government officials (even jobcentres and local councils) now have the power to snoop at will, without your knowledge or consent, and they can also see full details of all the websites you've ever visited.
|
Innocent people have the most to fear from out-of-control government snooping. A smart criminal will take steps to ensure he/she has a watertight alibi for any crime(s) committed. But if you are innocent of any crime, there's every chance you may not be able to supply an alibi. And why should you have to? When the government has everyone's fingerprints on record, in a few years' time, these will be made available to the police for matching against 900,000 unsolved crimes. In most cases a fingerprint left at a crime scene is incomplete or smudged. Therefore, police have to look for the best partial match against the perfect prints on file. In the past, where fingerprint databases have held only criminals' prints this has been a pretty good method of narrowing down the suspects. |
But where there are 60 million prints on file, even if the error rate for this process was as low as one in a million, every innocent citizen would be questioned and required to provide an alibi for around 60 unsolved crimes. There's every chance that this could happen to you. What if you have no alibi? And what an incredible waste of police time! Then there is the question of corrupt officials. There have been cases in the past of forged passports and visas, and even allegations that ministers have attempted to influence the granting of visas to foreign nationals. If a rich criminal wanted to obtain false ID, it wouldn't be a convicted robber that he would choose. It would be someone with a hitherto spotless record. And as far as the government was concerned, since they would be very reluctant to admit flaws in the system (as were the banks in the early days of cashpoints) the person who committed the subsequent bank robbery would be you. |
| "While we're not saying anything bad about the present government (for they are all honourable men) it is important to remember that less than one lifetime ago, that is to say within the memory of people still alive, certain governments incarcerated groups of their citizens and, in some cases, systematically destroyed them. The nations in which these evils occurred were not at the bottom of the civilized scale but, on the contrary, the nations concerned were considered highly developed, civilized, organized, industrialized, and were not altogether unlike Britain..." (read more) |
| Nothing to hide, nothing to fear? A warning from history.
In 1939, the German government conducted a census of all persons living in Germany. Census takers recorded each person's age, sex, residence, profession, religion, and marital status, and for the first time, they also listed the person's race as traced through his or her grandparents. This information was later punched into coded cards by thousands of clerks. | ![]() |
![]() | The cards were sorted and counted by the Hollerith machine, an early version of the modern computer. The Hollerith was invented in 1884 by a German-American engineer, Herman Hollerith. The machine was used in the United States and by most European governments for processing census data in the late 1800s and early 1900s. The Holleriths used by the Germans were developed by a German branch of the American company later known as International Business Machines (IBM). The information from the 1939 census helped Nazi official Adolf Eichmann to create the Jewish Registry, containing detailed information on all Jews living in Germany. The Registry also recorded the names of Jews in Austria and the Sudetenland of western Czechoslovakia, which were occupied by German troops in 1938 and 1939 and made part of the Reich (German empire). Nazi racial ideology and policies did not stop at Germany's borders. |
source: United States Holocaust Memorial Museum http://www.ushmm.org
After he was captured in 1960 and put on trial, Adolf Eichmann confessed to his executioner that "the fate of those killed in the Holocaust was sealed by their answers to the 1939 census on religious background recorded on paper for a Hollerith machine, an early mechanical computer. Quite literally, their cards were marked." In fact, all that citizens had to do to defeat the final solution was to avoid registration on the Hollerith cards. Just not be there when the census taker called. Once the holes were punched, Eichmann said, their fates were sealed.
source: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,6-2144204,00.html The Times, April 21, 2006
"When Bob received questionnaires at his office asking him to report if he, or anyone in his family was Jewish, we read them together, and I can still see his expression of disgust as he picked them up by the corner, opened the cover of our potbellied stove, and let them slowly fall into the fire. “ What are you going to do now?”, I asked. And he said “ I'm not going to fill out anything, and neither are you. I don't want to have anything to do with this, and whatever happens to us, we'll see.” ... I believed it was a cardinal error for people to report themselves for fear that otherwise someone else might."
" Janny Brandes-Brilleslijper, Holocaust survivor, whose husband's actions probably saved her life.
source: The last seven months of Anne Frank, Willy Lindwer, page 44 (Macmillan 1988 & 1991 ISBN 0 333 77965 7)